Thursday, September 3, 2020

Operations Management and Manufacturing Process Semi-Finished Product

Question: Depict about the Operations Management and Manufacturing Process for Semi-Finished Products. Answer: Presentation The way toward changing over crude material or semi-completed items into last or completed items utilizing work, apparatus and other significant assets is known as assembling. The way toward assembling is done by each business association with the goal that it can satisfy the requests of the clients (BusinessDictionary.com, 2016). Each business association in this world, in the case of working in administration area or in a creation segment, needs to make items or administrations either themselves or by re-appropriating it from an outsider. Assembling is the procedure that is fundamental for the security and vigor of an economy. It reinforces an economy as well as encourages the progression of cash and different assets inside an economy (Makingitincalifornia.com, 2016). Each organization on the planet has a structure for its assembling procedure or offering its types of assistance. An assembling configuration process permits the organizations to smooth out their activities, diminish their operational expenses, apportion satisfactory and appropriate assets, increment the general effectiveness and guarantee that the last items fulfill the quality guidelines. The structure of the assembling procedure for a firm can shift from industry to industry, firm to firm and can likewise fluctuate as indicated by the items that the organization produces. Attire Industry Apparel or article of clothing industry is probably the greatest business on the planet. It contributes essentially towards the economies of different nations. The dress or the piece of clothing industry includes creation of garments and articles of clothing, style industry, design retailers and exchanging of recycled garments and material reusing. Despite the fact that the instant article of clothing industry has been exceptionally censured by certain individuals for the utilization of sweatshops, kid work, piece work, and so on however it despite everything stays a reality that we need garments to wear and this industry can't bite the dust ever. ABC Company is one of the greatest apparel global organizations that has its working activities in two nations however has retail outlets in right around 28 nations. Renowned for its architect and in vogue garments, the organization was begun in 1976 in France. The organization has from that point forward made progress because of its capacity to fire up new patterns and react to the market request rapidly. The organization has such a smoothed out assembling process, that it takes the organization 7 days to about fourteen days to plan another piece of clothing and make it accessible on the racks of every one of its stores. Accordingly, by dealing with its tasks appropriately and utilizing an extremely effective flexibly chain framework, the organization has had the option to pick up abilities in the market and keep up it over the long haul. Components Effecting Manufacturing Process Design Attire industry is an industry where the way toward assembling must be exceptionally smoothed out and with no blunders as articles of clothing with abandons is wastage and a weight on the accounts of the organization. If there should arise an occurrence of ABC Company, the assembling procedure must be considerably progressively effective as it does its assembling tasks in two nations alone though the last items are to be dispatched to very nearly 28 nations. Thusly, the assembling procedure ought to be exceptionally exact, smoothed out and must be planned by the factors that influence the organization and the business. Let us presently examine some significant factors that have been molding the assembling procedure plan of the organization since its earliest reference point: Nature Of The Business/Industry Clothing industry is an industry which encounters high rivalry at a worldwide level. Client nowadays have the decision of buying articles of clothing and garments directly from their cell phones, which gives them a million items and brands to browse. In such a situation, it was essential for the organization to fabricate a brand and notoriety for itself. The companys fabricating process configuration mirrors the idea of the business or the business and furthermore mirrors the outlook of the organization, which was to manufacture a notoriety and brand picture in the market by keeping up high caliber of items. The organization has limited all the assembling procedure inside its central station for example in-house producing. Keeping all the creation procedure inside the house causes it feasible for the brand to keep up quality measures as it to can keep a closer beware of the procedure. Redistributing the assembling procedure can make it hard for the org anization to guarantee nature of articles of clothing. The organization has planned its procedure so that it can keep a more critical look and roll out vital improvements in the necessary time. Visit Changes In Market Trends one of the fundamental highlights of the piece of clothing industry is that it encounters visit changes in showcase patterns and structures. The adjustment in dress and piece of clothing patterns can be knowledgeable about continuous and organizations fabricating garments articles in millions can get defenseless against such market factors. In the event that an organization produces abundance amounts of pieces of clothing, a snappy change in the garments pattern can outdate those million articles and can cause gigantic misfortune for the organization. ABC Company has planned its assembling procedure so that it fabricates articles in a controlled way. It works five days per week and doesn't work at its full limit. It saves its most extreme work limit with respect to occasional occasions or periods when the interest as at its pinnacle levels. The organization has built up such a proficient arrangement of gracefully chain the board that it takes a limit of about fourteen days for the organization to makes its new items accessible on the racks of every one of its stores. Along these lines, the organization figures out how to keep its activities lean and assembling articles just in the amount required by different stores. The amounts of articles of clothing transported to the showrooms are as per the requests set by the head supervisors. The head supervisors are given the duty of putting orders for new articles and for the articles that are unavailable. When the request is put with the organization, the organization dispatches the request inside a couple of days so the request arrived at the outlet as quickly as time permits. As examined over, the organization limits all the assembling forms inside the house itself. It permits the organization to react to change in advertise patterns and any change that is knowledgeable about dressing styles, patterns, and so forth. The organization produces garments in a controlled way and as and when it encounters an adjustment in the dressing inclinations of individuals, it rolls out a speedy improvement in the assembling procedure and presents new structures in the market as quickly as time permits. Market And Consumer Demand the organization has structured its assembling procedure so that it has controlled the interest of the buyers in the market. The retail outlets encounters a high foot fall and the buys made in the retail locations are exceptionally high when contrasted with other serious brands. The purpose for this has been that the organization makes a constrained amount of its stock. At the point when the stock in the stores is restricted, the client needs to settle on a speedy choice as the item probably won't be accessible on the following day in the event that they return to make a buy. Further, the stock is created in such a restricted amount, that a client probably won't discover a month old item anyplace in the nation as new stock is refreshed in the stores on a week after week premise. The organization knows that the interest for in vogue and fashioner garments is in every case high and by planning its assembling procedure in a proficient way, the organization has had the option to keep up quality and uniqueness of items, which eventually expands the interest for the results of the organization. Financial Factors another central point behind the achievement of the organization has been its capacity to control the costs of its superior items through its assembling forms. The companys plan of assembling process permits it to decrease the operational expenses to an impressive degree and cut down the costs of its items. Where the adversary items cost around 300-400$, similar items from ABC Company cost around 150-200$. The administration of the organization knows about the way that in any event, during financial blast periods, individuals have a great deal of cash available to them and they purchase additionally attire items. Then again, the times of financial downturns hinder the deals as individuals don't spend much on garments. Therefore, the organization utilizes an assembling procedure that encourages it in lessening the operational and assembling costs. The final product is that the costs of final results are less expensive than the serious items even while the quality is high. Along these lines, the organization figures out how to abstain from setting up abundance deals as the items are as of now accessible at serious items and in any event, when the organization sets up an occasional deal in the entirety of its stores, the reaction is colossal (Smallbusiness.chron.com, 2016). Mechanical Factors the innovation and the assets accessible to an organization can likewise greatly affect the assembling procedure plan. On the off chance that all the assets and apparatus is effectively accessible at single spot, the assembling procedure gets simpler though if the assets or hardware is independently circulates, the assembling procedure configuration turns out to be progressively convoluted and long. For the vast majority of the organizations out there, the flowchart is to initially structure, at that point gauge followed by re-appropriating mass creation and coordinations. ABC Company has its own specific manner of planning things (Smallbusiness.chron.com, 2016). At ABC Company, the administration accepts that the plan matters and the rest can be effortlessly done. The organization has found every one of its assets, apparatus and innovation at a solitary spot for example the garments are structured, makes and sent from similar offices (Anon, 2016). The assembling p rocedure plan of the organization makes it an innovator as opposed to being an organization which follows the

Saturday, August 22, 2020

10 Fun Facts About University of Maryland

College of Maryland - College Park is home to numerous business people and fruitful columnists we catch wind of regularly. On the off chance that you dont know who Im alluding to, youre in for a major amazement with these 10 fun realities about UMD!1. The music video for â€Å"Only Wanna Be With You† by Hootie and the Blowfish was somewhat recorded at the Reckord Armory on the University of Maryland, College Park campus.2. Fellow benefactor of Google, Sergey Brin, went to UMD and graduated with a BS in Computer Science in 1993. Reward fun actuality: Sergeys father was additionally a math educator there! 3. Three-time Olympic athlete, Dominique Dawes, went to UMD and graduated in 2002 in the wake of winning the gold decoration at the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta. 4. Jim Henson, author of Muppets, graduated UMD with a degree in Home Economics. His underlying undertakings in manikin making (puppeteering?) began during his first year in school, where he made Sam and Friends.5. UMD has delivered Two Nobel Laureates: Raymond Davis Jr., who won the 2002 Nobel Prize in Physics, and Herbert Hauptman, who won the 1985 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. 6. Television character, Gulliana Rancic, and Seinfeld co-essayist, Larry David, additionally went to UMD. Entirely, quite, truly cool, huh? 7. The University of Maryland has delivered 18 Pulitzer Prize Winners, most quite Carl Bernstein, who was one of the correspondents who broke the Watergate outrage. 8. UMD appears to support a ton of business people. Kevin Plank, organizer and CEO of Under Armor, is likewise an UMD former student. 9. The 1974 ACC Men’s Basketball Tournament title is generally viewed as the best ACC game ever. UMD lost 103-100 in extra time to NC State. 10. Be that as it may, hello, theres no disgrace in the misfortune. UMD’s b-ball program has delivered 40 NBA players, including Steve Blake, Alex Len, and Greivis Vasquez! Is it accurate to say that you are hoping to apply toUMD? Make a point to look through profiles of understudies acknowledged to see articles, details, and guidance. Perceive how they got in, and how you can as well!

Friday, August 21, 2020

Analyse of the Wind That Shakes the Barley

The Wind That Shakes the Barley The breeze that shakes the grain is a film made of Ken Loach, the film are made in 2006 Setting: â€Å"The wind that shakes the barley† happens in Ireland, during the Irish War of Independence (1919-1921) and the Irish Civil War (1922-1923) and it is a genuine story. After World war 1. Put a plug for the home principle bill in Ireland there came English officers into Ireland and treated the Irish individuals downright terrible. At that point a portion of the Irish individuals got annoyed and started to retaliate. Resume:The film happens in the Northern Ireland in the twenties, during IRA's battle against the British attack of Ireland. The siblings Damien and Teddy O’Donovan join a renegade development with certain companions, after Damien’s bombed endeavor to get away to London to turn into a specialist, and after British officers executed an awesome companion of his. The gathering is the beginning of the Irish people groups ascend against the British intrusion, and numerous individuals begins joining bunches simply like theirs. They get captured by the British, and Teddy gets tormented by pulling out his nails, to make him state names, yet he doesn't uncover his insider facts to anyone.Afterwards they get Damien in. The â€Å"boss† takes steps to execute Damien in the event that he doesn't educate him regarding who encourages them, however Damien is quiet and gets tossed over into the cell. The youthful fighter who should shoot Damien causes them escape, yet since he has no key to the last cell, three of the hostages get left behind. The others escape in a pony attracted carriage and remain a little house while Teddy recuperates. At the point when Teddy is prepared to travel once more, they go to some solid companions to live for a while.Here they discover that one of Damien’s most established companions Chris Reilly, a youthful person who chipped away at a British homestead to procure cash to his family, was the one telling on them, and got them sent to prison. They get requests to execute both Chris and Sir John, and Damien shoots them. Later he converses with his darling, Sinead ni Shuilleabhain, about the disgrace in confronting Chris' mom. After IRA's destruction on a British caravan, another separation burns down Sinead's home as compensation, and shaves her head while pointing a weapon at her. Damien and the others see everything from behind a slope, however there are no way around it.The British are too much. At the point when the British leave, Sinead is still profoundly in stun, and keeping in mind that Damien solaces her, an errand person shows up with the message of a formal truce among Britain and the IRA. The entire town celebrates, however not for long, in light of the fact that they get some answers concerning the Anglo-Irish arrangement, and the IRA isolates in two gatherings. Teddy is finished battling and acknowledges the arrangement. He and his partner s begin watching in Irish Army-regalia. Damien and his companions won't acknowledge the bargain and joins the Anti-arrangement IRA.Damien gets captured and his Anti-settlement companion Dan was murdered in their endeavor of taking weapons from the British armed force. Characters Damien is a recently graduated specialist from school. You can see he is an ongoing alumni in light of the fact that in the film he is generally youthful, and alludes to himself as: Medical alumni from school. His sibling named Teddy. Separately, they speak to a situation comparable to how Ireland ought to be free †Damien will battle through political methods, and Teddy will battle with viciousness. Which is regular in social orders with war, there will consistently be various conclusions on the best way to unravel the contention.

Saturday, June 13, 2020

Explain the rise of corruption and organised crime

Corruption as will be examined was nothing new in the post-Soviet economy for its perceived rise and that of organised crime had their origins in the Soviet era. In the Soviet Union private enterprise on an individual or business basis had officially not been allowed from when the New Economic Policy was abandoned in the 1920s and with the forced collectivization of agriculture during the 1930s. Under the Stalinist State the economy was planned and commanded by the Communist Party via the Soviet Unions statestructure. In theory the Soviet State controlled every aspect of the Soviet economy. It set prices; it controlled industrial outputs, banking services and foreign exchange rates. However, in practice therewas a flourishing black market in luxury goods and foreign exchangerates before the political and economic reforms started by Mikhail Gorbachev in the 1980s. His twin policies of Glasnost and Perestroika, political openness and economic restructuring were intended to prolong the Soviet Union. Instead the Soviet Union would collapse leaving its successor states working towards democracy and capitalism whilst facing up to the problem of increasing corruption and organised crime. The level of corruption if not organised crime during the Soviet era might not be too easy to establish exactly. The Soviet authorities after all kept the true state of the economy hidden from the West even if its citizens experienced hardships and shortages. The leading members of the politburo had being the only ones with a realistic view of the economy. The liberalisation of the economy in all parts of the former Soviet Union since 1991 have generally led to an increase of corruption and organised crime. Clampdowns on organised crime and corruption have often been half hearted when they have been carried out both during and after the Soviet era. Explanations for this rise in corruption and organised crime will now be described and examined. Some of these causes pre-date the collapse of the Soviet Union whilst others emerged later. Black markets existed prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union often bringing consumers goods that were unavailable in the state run shops, goods that were sometimes exchanged instead of sold to avoid breaking the law. Hand in hand with the black markets went corruption and bribery. Black marketers frequently resorted to bribing communist party officials, the police and the KGB or they in turn extorted money off the black marketers. The KGB sometimes recruited some of the black marketers to inform on their rivals and their customers. The more the Soviet economy faltered the faster the black-market grew, providing people with goods not available in the shops. Those marketers that did not bribe officials often found their homes or businesses raided or got put in jail, those that paid up were allowed to go about their business undisturbed. The Soviet leadership started to have concerns about economic stagnation, organised crime and to a lesser extent corruption in the early 1980s but n one of them seemed to understand the extent of the economic malaise. The long years of stagnation continued until despite the rapid deaths of three general secretaries of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) between 1982-1985. Leonid Brezhnev during his time in charge had done nothing to halt economic decline and in fact worsened it by accelerating the arms race with the United States and invading Afghanistan. It has been estimated that as much as 50% of the Soviet Unions annual budges was spent on defence or related products and projects. However that was money that the Soviet Union no longer had to spare. His immediate successor Yuri Andropov started a campaign against bribery and corruption that petered out with his death in 1984. When Gorbachev replaced Konstantin Chernenko a year later he pledged to reform the Soviet Union. Instead his policies would promote its collapse and lead to increased corruption and organised crime in the sixteen successor states. The problem with Stalinist economic planning was that it created and perpetuated a shortage economy motivated only by harsh orders from the centre. It kept most of the people equally poor except for those that found ways around the system. By the 1980s the idea of abandoning the communist command economy in favour of capitalism and liberal democracy gained ground not only in the Soviet Union but also in Central and Eastern Europe. For the reformers could look at the neo-liberal experience of the Thatcher and Reagan administrations, perhaps the devastating social and economic effects in parts of Latin America would have been more relevant. There was of course the example of the New Economic Policy that had allowed the Soviet economy to recover from the ravages of civil war, an attractive example to communists that wanted to reform the system but also for the non-communists that wished to replace it. There was one group of pro-capitalist economists that hoped to bring in a market system to Russia, they were the young reformers. Yeger Gaider whose family was amongst the elites of the Soviet nomenklatura ironically enough headed the young reformers. They were just looking for somebody to carry out their plans and not power for themselves, and would eventually team up with Boris Yeltsin a highly effective (when healthy) populist politician with only a limited understanding of economics. Alongside Yeltsin, they had the dream of dismantling communism. However the way in which communism was dismantled across the former Soviet Union would contribute greatly to the rise of organised crime alongside the already high levels of corruption. In the first years of Gorbachevs rule his government attempted topreserve the Soviet political system whilst reforming its economicsystem, little realising that these reforms would fail and thuscontribute to the rise of corruption and organised crime as well as thedisintegration of the Soviet Union. He wanted to make the system workto its full capacity without moving to a capitalist economy or inducingeconomic suffering. The government attempted to increase productivityby reducing alcohol consumption and the sickness that was oftenconnected to it, but he did not run an anti corruption campaignimmediately. Gorbachev would have banned vodka but feared the ban wouldbe circumvented by organised crime gangs, plus the tax revenues thatkept the Soviet government solvent. One man who had started ananti-corruption campaign was Boris Yeltsin who was the Moscow partyboss until his sudden dismissal by Gorbachev during November 1987.Gorbachev believed he had removed his greatest rival but had in factmade a very basic political blunder, as Yeltsin was no longercontrollable and determined to avenge his fall from power. By 1989 it became clear that the Soviet economic system wasunsustainable or beyond reforming and Gorbachev introduced somecapitalist measures. Those measures included allowing small privatebusinesses to operate from August 1990 and a series of de-regulationsand privatisations between October 1990 and July 1991. Economic reformsbrought increased opportunities to organised criminals and buddingcapitalist entrepreneurs, a distinction in the former Soviet Union thatis not always clear. The sudden creations of small businesses increasedchances for investments and money laundering or even to takeoverprivatised companies. Decades of communist economic and politicalrule left a legacy that was difficult to shake off immediately in thepost-Soviet era. Yeltsin and his contemporaries found it difficult tosee the world from outside of a communist perspective. The communistlegacy of patronage, privileges, corruption and perks would contributeto the rise of corruption and organised crime in the pos t-Soviet era.As the system started to collapse across the Soviet Union law and orderbegan to decline with it thus allowing increased opportunities fororganised crime and corruption as well as increased nationalist andethnic tensions. The political disintegration of the Soviet Union went hand in hand withits economic disintegration and declining levels of law and order inall the successor republics. The end of the Soviet Union was hastenedby the failure of the communist coup in August 1991. The Baltic Stateshad already broke away from the Soviet Union and was already on theirway to capitalist economies. Russian president Boris Yeltsin seemingto stand for the twin transition from communist state to liberaldemocracy and planned socialist economy to neo-liberal capitalismalthough this is not exactly what happened. Contrary to MikhailGorbachev, Boris Yeltsin had believed that the break up of the SovietUnion could be a positive rather than a disastrous event although manyof his Russian compatriots might not have agreed with him. For theother former republics it was a case of independence at last. Perhapsthose that took advantage of the break up through organised crime orcorruption would have agreed with him. The Yeltsi n government at firstenthusiastically backed rapid and radical reforms, radical economicscarried out by a group of advisors dubbed the the young reformers.Russia and the other former republics of the Soviet Union had veryprimitive banking and financial systems that presented apparently idealopportunities for Russian and foreign investors. Those acting as gobetweens in business deals could make small fortunes by doing so. Thetransition to capitalism offered the prospect of making millions, italso led to the increase in organised crime and corruption as gangstersthreatened investors, businesses and often fought each other. TheRussian and other governments seemed incapable of monitoring,containing or preventing that rise. The Yeltsin government was hampered in its efforts to control andadminister the regions let alone fight the rise in crime because theremaining regional governors were by and large communist nomenklaturaand apparatchiks and unwilling to do as Moscow commanded. Thesebureaucrats forged links with industrialists in their region providinga basis for ongoing and future corruption. The bitter power strugglesbetween President and Parliament during the 1992-1993 period distractedthem from trying to solve the countrys problems and allowed theregions greater autonomy and the increasing number of organised crimegangs free rein across much of Russia and the rest of the former SovietUnion. They also spent much time and effort trying to persuade thepublic the other side was more corrupt and had greater links toorganised crime than they did. One deputy governor indicated thescale of corruption in the remoter parts of Siberia that to start acompany you probably have to bribe forty bureaucrats. Organised crime gangs used the decline in government control toorganise protection rackets to fleece investors and small businesses.There was an alarming increase in violent crimes and murders as gangscompeted for control of their victims and clients or punished thosethat would not pay for their dubious protection. The number of killingsrelated to gang warfare escalated dramatically. Moscow and the newlyrenamed St Petersburg have been the centres of most of that gangwarfare. Corruption was not merely confined to the Mafia gangs it alsoextended to the police, the armed forces and civil servants. In Russiatraffic police were involved in robbing motorists also teaming up withlocal gangs to force motorists to hand over their cars, or to pay themfines for non-existent offences or face their cars being confiscated.Corruption and the buying and selling of any thing and everything wasso widespread that young female university students would aim to becomehard currency call girls or the mistre sses of oligarchs or wealthybusinessmen, whilst jobless youths would advertise their services forcontract killings. One ruthless organised crime gang even went as far as murdering carowners and disposing of their bodies to steal their cars. Organisedcrime and the number of crime gangs increased dramatically as thepolitical elites spent more time arguing amongst each other rather thanfighting crime and corruption. Nobody in the public or the mediabelieved that Boris Yeltsin would succeed in rooting out organisedcrime and corruption, after all every single Soviet leader had promisedto do the same since 1917. After all his only previous crack down oncorruption and organised crime in Moscow had been stopped it its tracksby Gorbachev when he was sacked as the Moscow party boss. The officialcrime figures for 1992 give a strong indication of the deterioratinglaw and order situation. The number of murders had increased by 40%whilst there was an even larger increase in robbery up by 60%. The overall number of registered crimes, bearing in mind that many crimesremained unreported went up to 2.76 million. In fact the contendingelites accused each other of corruption to score points off each otherwhilst the public were not interested in their squabbles and the 3,000or so crime gangs carried on regardless. Of the newly private runbusiness in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States those3,000 gangs were able to pocket perhaps as much as 40 % of the turnoveras early as 1993. Corruption was never to far from the surface in the former SovietUnion. It should have not been a surprise therefore that corruption andorganised crime would rise in the post-Soviet as they already hadstrong foundations and connections to outside crime gangs. During theSoviet era if an individual knew or bribed the right officials theycould get the best luxury items, property deals or their children intothe finest schools or universities. So nobody could doubt that therewould be greater levels of corruption when the restraints of the Sovietsystem were removed. In fact corruption dated back into the ImperialRussian past, were the civil service had been unsalaried but able toaccept gifts or payments in kind. The CPSU may have claimed to beresponsible for the leading role in society and the economy, some ofits members took a leading role in the black market or for a smallbribe get people things that would not normally be available. In Belarus the movement towards independence was given a new impetus bythe desire to be rid of greedy and corrupt communist party leaders.The unraveling of the Soviet hegemony over Eastern Europe gave anopportunity for the more entrepreneurial members of the withdrawingSoviet army to make their fortunes. The pickings could be rich for theSoviet army had large areas of land and housing to sell. When Gorbachevmade a deal with the West German government to sell Soviet militarybases in the former East Germany back to them most of the best pickingshad already gone. The Soviet defence minister Dmitrii Yazov happilyjoined in the schemes that led to the disappearance of the Soviet armyassets without a trace. Yazov may have enjoyed making money forhimself but he was wholeheartedly against political and economicreform. He would be one of the main leaders of the August 1991 coup.After all under the Soviet system the higher an individuals positionwithin the party, the KGB or the armed forces the y could expect agreater share of the perks and the spoils. Just how much money the corrupt communist party members made may not beknown exactly, much of the evidence was destroyed just before the finalfailed coup of August 1991. Those party members that did not get intotrouble following the coup could find themselves in a good position tomake money in the brave new post -Soviet world. That was because theyalready knew how to operate in corrupt systems and some already hadlinks with organised crime. For many of the small traders that operatedlargely illegally during the Soviet era the only real differencebetween the past and the post-Soviet present was whom they paid for theprivilege of staying in business. Now they had to pay organised crimegangs to stay in business and to stay alive rather than bribe communistparty officials or members of the KGB, or if they were unlucky theywould have to pay them all. Corruption and organised crime increased inthe post-Soviet era but it had great potential during the Soviet eraand the right conditions woul d fuel a massive expansion. For much of the former Soviet Union these conditions were present inthe early 1990s. Petty crime was rumored to be rife amongst civilservants and state employees, for instance in 1993 the Russian InteriorMinistry recorded 13,000 such crimes, that was thought to be the tip ofthe iceberg. It was estimated that virtually all shops paid protectionand perhaps four fifths of businesses and financial institutes did thesame. The organised crime gangs had a virtual free reign on theirprospective victims, as the number of untainted police was inadequateeven if they could find any brave or foolish enough to testify. Themore successful entrepreneurs could hire bodyguards but that was not anoption for the smaller traders who had to pay up or face theconsequences. In Russia neither the transition to democracy and the switch to acapitalist economy has developed as the Russians and those in the restof the world that were interested hoped or expected. These transitionsunintentionally led to increased corruption and organised crime.Through a combination of the collapse of the archaic economic system,assets stripping by the Russians that brought utilities at cheapprices, government failings and last but no means least corruption.Russia was in a worse economic position than the Soviet Union had been,as were the majority of the former Soviet republics. Inward foreigninvestment during the 1990s did not make up for the vast sums that leftRussia of between $100 billion and $150 billion made by the oligarchsthat asset stripped Russias industries and infra-structure and doesnot include any of the profits made the organised crime gangs. Foreign investors, the more sensible ones at least were put off thepossibility of investing in Russia and other parts of the former SovietUnion by the high risk of their investment been ruined by having to paybribes to officials and protection to crime gangs. It seems that theonly people prospering in post-Soviet Russia are those that becamenouveau riche by their investments or those that made their money lesshonestly through extortion or corruption. Poverty and unemployment thatdid not officially exist during the Soviet era increased alarminglyduring the 1990s. Even if the poverty line is measured below a monthlyincome of less than $30 a month up to 40 million Russians appear tolive in poverty. That is alarming for a country that has the largestpart of the Soviet Union that had been a military superpower until1991. Economically Russias decline was remarkable for its severity,producing less than Belgium and barely a quarter more than Poland. In the immediate post-Soviet period the situation was more chaoticbecause all the former republics were still maintaining the old Sovietcurrency and printing money as if it was going out of fashion, addingto the inflationary consequences of ending price controls. The chaoticsituation increased the ease in which organised crime gangs couldoperate in the former Soviet Union. Whilst the resulting hyperinflation(added to by the removal of price controls) meant that many moreordinary people had to find alternative methods of supplementing theirincomes. Russia was not the slowest country to reform its economy orpolitical institutions Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Belarus accordingto European Bank of Reconstruction and Development were amongst theleast reformed and most poverty struck. In contrast the Baltic Statesof Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia progressed well enough to be admittedin the European Union by 2004. The adoption of free market capitalism brought an end to queuing inempty shops and replaced it with full shops where most people could notafford to actually buy anything. Hence people were searching for legalor illegal means of boosting their incomes and thus more likely tobecome involved in corruption and bribery. Uneconomic factories wereshut making millions unemployed. Under the Soviet system people hadless money but there was better state provisions and prices were fixedso inflation was virtually non-existent. The Soviet system had givenprivileges to countless petty state workers and junior party members.They were known as apparatchiks, whilst high ranking officials andsenior party members with better perks were known as nomenklatura. Withthe end of the Soviet system some of these apparatchiks andnomenklatura exchanged their privileges for money, those still in stateemployment that had remained honest now exchanged favours for bribes.Corruption increased during the post-Soviet er a simply out of economicnecessity right across all of the former Soviet Union as ordinarycitizens and government officials found that they did not enough tolive on. Throughout the former Soviet Union the pace of economicliberalisation varied. By the middle of 1994 the Baltic States and Russia in terms of thetotal percentage of gross domestic product generated by the privatesector of the economy were well ahead of the Asian republics, Belarusand Moldova. In Estonia and Latvia it was 55%, in Russia and Lithuania50 % with Belarus, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan lagged far behind ononly 15%. In post-Soviet Russia nomenklatura were better placed thanmost to survive the harsher economic climate particularly those thatlived in regions such as Siberia found it harder to survive especiallywhen state subsidies ended leaving food and fuel far more expensivethan in the major cities. The collapse of communism cut off many of theremote industrial and mining areas from the central government leadingto social and economic decay. Such neglect has allowed for the growthof organised crime and corruption as desperate people turn to drugs andalcohol. Drug and alcohol abuse leads to health problems or addiction.To counter some of the incursions i nto those remote areas by crimegangs the Putin government once more restricted travel in to thoseareas. A factor that contributed to the rise of organised crime in thepost-Soviet was the wide availability of weapons for organised crimegangs and individual gangsters or thugs to use. Weapons were oftenobtained from members of the armed forces. Military and naval personnelwere increasingly eager to sell weapons to supplement their wages,assuming they had been paid on time. The Russian commanders are said tohave done worse during the first Chechen war of 1994 -1996. They soldGrozny back to the rebels in August 1996 leading to the deaths ofdefenceless conscripts. Corruption within the Russian military seemsto be endemic, which given its role in maintaining central governmentauthority and internal security in some of the remoter regions of theRussian Federation certainly permitted and even encouraged organisedcrime to rise, for instance in Chechnya. During the second Chechen warthat began in 1999 the local police observed the illicit trade betweenRussian soldiers and local black marketers. These soldiers would exchange boxes of ammunition for locally distilledvodka or locally grown cannabis with the tacit approval of theirsuperior officers. Indeed officers often accompanied their men whenthese exchanges took place. The black marketers then sell theammunition to the Chechen fighters. Local police could intervene andarrest everybody but they have either been told not to or bribed notto. The army was supposed to keep all the roads into Chechnya secureto prevent the rebels escaping or gaining supplies and money. However,the reporter Anna Politkovskaya was told one person on foot must pay100 roubles; a light vehicle costs about 500-600 roubles.Politkovskaya did not readily accept those claims until shesuccessfully bribed the soldiers to get past the checkpoint. The greedand corruption of the army must have been counterproductive. They soldammunition that was used by the Chechens and they allowed access torestricted areas to anybody who could have smuggled weapons in andpeop le out. The corruption of the Russian armed forces in the area inand around Chechnya lowered the security and containment of Chechenfighters and contributed to the apparent ease in which rebels were ableto take hostages in the Moscow theatre during October 2002. Morehorrifically the siege of a Beslan high school in September 2004 showedthat the Russian military were incompetent as well as riddled withcorruption. Gangsters did not always buy weapons; they could often steal weaponsfrom poorly guarded or neglected military bases. Due to the SovietUnion having national service most of the organised crime gang memberscould already use weapons. Troops leaving the army could also consideremployment as either bodyguards for the newly rich and the justifiablyconcerned business owners or joining the organised crime gangsthemselves as thugs and assassins. Violent crime is probably not asprevalent as people in the West might believe, however crime gangswould have no qualms about settling accounts with intimidation, assaultand murder. Some murders have shown that the crime gangs and contractkillers are able to gain hold of sophisticated weapons such as rocketlaunchers to kill bodyguards as well as their bosses in St Petersburg.Gangs have to be well connected as well as rich to acquire suchweapons. The dramatic rise in the murder rate witnessed not only the deaths ofpoliticians (three members of the Duma were shot dead in cold blood)but also businessmen and journalists. Business executives and morelowly bank employees could be and were at risk of being killed due tothe rise in corruption and organised crime. Not many gang members wereafraid of being caught and convicted, for they were confident that evenif the police did catch them that either the police or the courts couldbe persuaded to let them get away with it. In the period between 1992and 1995, the number of killed bank workers ranging from clerks tosenior executives was 46. The most publicized killing was that of IvanKivelidi who had been the president of Rosbiznesbank. Kivelidi waspoisoned in August 1995 for not complying with the demands of organisedcriminals. There are still a high number of deaths as a result offighting between rival gangs still demonstrating that there are enoughguns and money up for grabs to make t he high risks of being killed seemworthwhile. Over 2,000 gang members are gunned down every year in gangwars in the Moscow region alone. Until the Putin presidency thesituation in St Petersburg had been worse although Putin seems to wantto clean up his home city. The difficulty and the danger of uncovering the true level of crimesbeing committed aided the rise in organised crime and corruption. Withso many bureaucrats, police and politicians involved or thought to beinvolved in corruption much of the uncovering of crimes and evidence ofcorruption came from the press and journalists or even rarelyindependently minded politicians. For journalists it was dangerous touncover and attempt to publish evidence and articles concerningorganised crime gangs and the high levels of corruption. Consideringthe increasing control of the media by the state or by oligarchs whoseown positions could be undermined by revelations of corruption ororganised crime it has not always been easy for reporters to go publicwith evidence they have gathered. To illustrate the dangerous positionjournalists found themselves in, 36 were killed between January 1994and May 1995 throughout the former Soviet Union whilst doing their jobsand reporting on not only corruption and orga nised crime but also theconflict in Chechnya. The uncovering of evidence of the corruption and fraud within theSoviet army during its time in East Germany and before its departureappeared to be a major scope for the Moskovskii komsomolets and itsinvestigative journalist Dmitrii Kholodov. For Kholodov it proved onestory too far as a bomb blew up him and his office during October1994. Even television reporters and journalists were not immune fromdanger. Following his research into the corrupt or dishonest sellingof television advertising Vladimir Listev was gunned down in March 1995before he could broadcast all his findings. At other timespoliticians, bureaucrats and business executives would inform or leakinformation about their rivals real or presumed links with organisedcrime and corruption for their own gain rather than in the publicinterest or to fight corruption itself. Whilst these bouts ofaccusations and counter accusations occupied the politicians and pressattentions they occasionally removed the expendable politicians an dbureaucrats whilst leaving the level of overall corruption untouched. As noted below the Books affair would be used to force the resignationsof some of the young reformers in 1999. Accusations of corruptionwould also be leaked to the press after an individual had lost theapproval of either President Yeltsin or President Putin. The primeexample of this were the accusations leveled against Boris Berezovskyafter he fell out with Putin, or more aptly when Putin regarded him asno longer useful to the Kremlin. Berezovsky is claimed to have stolenmillions from his companies and state run companies such as Aeroflot.All these events were from the early 1990s so the Russian governmenthad plenty of time to prove them or clear him. Berezovsky who went toexile in London has retaliated by campaigning against the Putingovernments increasing control of power. In Russia it appears thatthose involved in corruption or organised crime are relatively immunefrom arrest as long as they do not upset the Kremlin or theirpunishment becomes politically expedient for the governme nt. PresidentPutin is arguably searching for levers that will work to have inplace a national authority that functions as normal governments do. Corruption was a fact of life in the Soviet era and now seems even moreendemic in the post-Soviet period; ordinary Soviet citizens werecynical about the financial honesty of their political masters and thehigher-ranking communist party officials, a cynicism that continueswith post-Soviet politicians and officials. Evidence of corruption andbribery would often be collected by the KGB and used if the individualsconcerned fall out of favour senior party members, its successor stillcollects such information only now some its officers are more likely tosell sensitive information to the highest bidders. President Yeltsinonly renamed the KGB the FSB instead of abolishing it. He also retainedcontrol of the KGB records and evidence of the corruption theycontained Timely uncovering of bribe taking and corruption have oftenbeen used to discredit rivals and justify the dismissal of ministersand officials. Therefore presumably there is usually enough evidenceto act against many of those involved in corruption or organised crimebut not always the political will or judicial authority to do so. ManyRussians believe that most if not all government ministers andofficials are corrupt and susceptible to bribes. Officials are willingto risk public safety and even national security as well as theirreputations for the sake of bribes. Allegations and counterallegations of corruption were used in the 1990s during the powerstruggle between President Yeltsin and hard-liners such as Rutskoy andKhasbulatov. Corruption both in the Soviet era and afterwards existed and increasedbecause the majority of those accepting bribes or using their positionfor gain position or cash believed that they would not get caught. Evenif they did get caught the rate of convictions were not that high.Soviet era clampdowns on corruption under Andropov and Gorbachev onlycaught small fry and the same could apply during the post-Soviet era.The only notable high ranking communist to be convicted for corruptionwas Yuri Churbanov in 1988. Churbanovs father in law was the lateLeonid Brezhnev, the one time Soviet leader and General Secretary thattolerated corruption more than any other Soviet era leader. Churbanovgot caught taking $1 million in bribes. Perhaps the dishonest officialswere working on their version of Marxism, such as all bureaucrats arecorrupt but some are more corrupt than others are. The chairman of theKGB, Chebrikov was widely seen to be increasingly corrupt the more theSoviet Union imploded. Yeltsi n seemed unable if not unwilling toprevent corruption and organised crime increasing added to belief ofmany that they could get away with it. The rise of corruption and organised crime in the post-Soviet era canbe accounted for partly as a result of the previous illegality ofprivate enterprise. The sudden adoption of shock therapy in 1992occurred before any new corporate or financial regulations could beintroduced to ensure that competition between businesses would be freeand fair or those financial transactions could be above board and leavean audit trail. The government had not forewarned the Russian peopleabout the likely consequences of economic reforms. Hyper inflation andunemployment meant many of them got power, after all pensions, pay orbenefit payments could not keep pace with 245% inflation (that wasJanuary 1992 monthly total and equated to an annual rate well over2,000%). Soviet era political and economic elites away from the mainurban areas would often team up with local organised crime gangs. Theydid that to make up as much money as possible from the conversion tocapitalism. The switch to capitalism gave forme r party members andofficials chances to grab their share of the crumbling Sovietinfrastructures. Whilst people such as Boris Berezovsky and RomanAbramovich were on their way to making billions the Russian governmentwas running out of money. So short of money in fact that it had toreceive a $10.2 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund in1996. The problem for Yeltsin and the other leaders of the post-Soviet stateswas that the spine of the Soviet State had been the communist party.The power and influence of the Russian central government graduallywithered away during Yeltsins two terms as President. Poorly equippedand lowly paid Russian conscripts sold their weapons to Chechen rebels,in the city of Tver armed gangs extracted tolls from motorists;regional governors and companies, kept taxes that should have gone tothe Kremlin. Civil servants, teachers and health visitors moonlightedfor private businesses, as their wages were too low. Having publicsector employers on the payroll has proved highly invaluable fororganised crime and businesses. When bidding for local and centralgovernment contracts or highly sensitive information, senior officialand ministers have been known to provide organised crime gangs andbusiness executives with security permits that prevent their arrests.Another common fraud was for companies to set up fa ke non-existentrivals when they bid for central, regional and local governmentcontracts, ensuring they won the contracts. It was an alternative tobribing officials, which could prove expensive and did not always gainthe contracts anyway. The collapse in central government authorityextended to the law courts, if the defendant knew the right people orpaid the highest bribes they could get away with murder, fraud ortheft. According to Freeland Russia developed a kind of Hobbesiancapitalism, red in tooth and claw in which businesses preyed on smallerones and apparatchiks and racketeers preyed on everyone. Economic growth in Russia and peoples real monetary worth is hard tomeasure due to corruption, dishonesty, and the lack of a coherentbanking system and the lack of savings in bank accounts. Even if the central government took action against officials they couldoften be found jobs in local and regional government. Local mayors andgovernors especially those of Moscow and St Petersburg had lucrativecontracts to award for reconstruction and building projects. TheMoscow city council in particular gained a reputation for high spendingand legally dubious contract awards. The mayor of Moscow, Yuri Luzhkovwould often give contracts to companies that had connections with hiswife. Luzhkov had presidential ambitions at one stage and was noadmirer of Boris Yeltsin but has better relations with Vladimir Putin.Not only was Boris Yeltsin unable to halt the rise of organised crimeand corruption in post-Soviet Russia he actually contributed to theproblem. Yeltsin contributed to the problem in various ways someaccidental others less so. He was unable to halt the decline in thepower of the central government, having spent most of his first term asPresident competing for control with the Ru ssian Supreme Soviet andthen the Duma. His second term was beset by his worsening health thatpartly explained his decision to retire early. Another contribution tothe failure to combat organised crime and corruption was the almostconstant changing of government ministers. Instability and uncertainlycontinued to plague central government meaning it was unable to controlthe country properly thus hampering any efforts to fight crime. WhenYeltsin did find capable Prime Ministers he would fire them if hethought they were getting too powerful and ambitious e.g. YevgenyPrimakov and Viktor Chernomyrdin. Of all his Prime Ministers the onlyone he trusted was the one man who would succeed him as President,Vladimir Putin. Finally there was the links with the so-calledoligarchs that Boris Yeltsin and his family had. The young reformers who had been out of power and influence since 1993still argued that further privatisations and action against corruptionwas needed to ensure Russias economic stability and well being.However with Boris Yeltsins re-election in 1996 they regainedinfluence particularly through Anatoly Chubais and Kokh, even the PrimeMinister Chernomyrdin believed they undermined his position. Forwhatever reason the Russian public believed that these young reformersshould be impeccably honest without any doubts about being corrupt. Onthe other hand ordinary Russians were expecting the older politiciansto be more likely to be corrupt. That public belief about the integrity of the young reformers stemmedfrom their claims to be clearing Russia of the unhealthy and unethicalrelationship between big businesses and the highest reaches of theKremlin and central government. They also hoped to clean out thebribery and corruption out of the Russian civil service and governmentdepartments. The young reformers intended actions seemed to threatenthe position of oligarchs such as Vladimir Gusinsky and BorisBerezovsky. However the oligarchs were able to break the youngreformers with a pre-emptive strike, ironically links between one ofthe young reformers and an oligarch gave Boris Berezovsky hisopportunity. Using their connections with the press the oligarchs wereable to discredit and then destroy the image of the young reformers asbeing incorruptible. Alfred Kokh was discovered to have received amodest $100,000 advance payment to write a payment on market reformsand privatisations in Russia. Kokh seemed to have helped (it wass uggested) his friend, the oligarch Vladimir Potanin to acquire stateenterprises namely Sviazinvest and Norilsk Nickel. Seeing thedirection events were moving in Kokh had the good sense to leave thegovernment and find elsewhere (but not as a writer). The youngreformers seemed to have resisted the oligarchs attempts to removethem from government and even persuaded Boris Yeltsin to sack BorisBerezovsky from his government post. That was until advances foranother book about economic policy were revealed on the radio and inthe press. Anatoly Chubais and four of his colleagues lost their jobs as a resultof the $450,000 fees they received from a book company directlycontrolled by one of Vladimir Potanins corporations. With thedeparture of the young reformers went the chance of any serious actionagainst corruption and organised crime until the emergence of the Putinpresidency, although he continued their economic reforms and policieswhilst he was Prime Minister. It was another example of corruption orfinancial irregularity being highlighted for political rather thaneconomic or legal reasons. The figures used to condemn Chubais and theothers would appear paltry compared to the sums that Berezovsky andother leading oligarchs were accused of taking after they fell out offavour with Putin. However for those Russians with good memories theallegations against Chubais were nothing new. He had been accused in1992 of selling state property to organised crime gangs and wealthyforeigners at amazingly reduced prices. Putin to t he surprise of someof the richest and most powerful in Russia turned out not to be the manto keep the cash flowing into the right pockets. Just how much Boris Yeltsins family and friends were closely liked toorganised crime and corruption became more apparent during August 1999.Two scandals showed that Boris Yeltsin either knew about or did notstop the rising level of corruption linked to the Kremlin. The firstone could have proved very problematic; Boris Yeltsin was so concernedhe almost ended his fishing holiday early. The Mabetex affair hadactually started to emerge at the start of 1999. There had been moneylaundering and corruption on such a vast scale that even the cynicalRussians were surprised. The first person to fall victim to thefollowing investigation was the chief of the Kremlin PropertyDevelopment, Pavel Borodin. Borodin was close to Boris Yeltsin but evencloser to both Boris Yeltsins daughters and son in laws. Borodin wasbelieved to have awarded billion dollar contracts on the basis that thehighest bribers, such as Behgjet Pacolli won them. The other scandal actually brought to public attention in the Unit edStates. Articles in the New York Times claimed that Russian organisedcrime gangs in conjunction with Russian government officials were usingAmerican banks to launder vast sums of their illegal earnings. Furtherinvestigations uncovered only a fraction of the $10billion claimed tohave gone through the Bank of New York. The Mabetex affair was far moreserious as Borodin had control of $600 billion. A Swiss court found himguilty of taking $30 million of bribes from Swiss companies in 2001. Since gaining the Presidency in 2000 Vladimir Putin has tried toreverse the rise in organised crime and corruption Putin regarded theweakness of the central government as being responsible for that rise.Not only did he wish to restore the states power to fight crime andcorruption he also wished to restore Russias economic andinternational position. His efforts to do this have met with domesticopposition and complaints from abroad due to the authoritarian methodsadopted to do so. Putin may have owed his swift rise to power to thepatronage of Boris Yeltsin and his powerful associates but Putinsoutlook owes a great deal to his career in the KGB and its successorthe FSB. Putin was unswervingly loyal towards Yeltsin who in turn didhis best to ensure Putin gained the presidential succession. Putin didnot believe he owed any such loyalty to the oligarchs that surroundedPresident Yeltsin and the Yeltsin family. Once in power Putin decidedto launch campaigns against organised crime and corrup tion, influencedperhaps by the similar anti-corruption campaign of one of his formerheroes Yuri Andropov. Unlike either Yeltsin or Andropov, Putin appearedto have age and health on his side. Putin is also a man capable ofmanipulating Russias incomplete and flawed democracy for his ownends. Before becoming Prime Minister, Putin had returned to head theFSB to ensure its loyalty to Boris Yeltsin and later himself. He spendhis second spell at the FSB prudently gaining information on hispotential rivals and opponents but it must also surely given him aninsight into the extent of corruption and organised crime in Russia. Putins image as been a tough leader in terms of trying to restore theKremlins authority, crushing the Chechen separatists and restoring lawand order contributed to his presidential election victories in 2000and 2004. In 2000 the victory was narrower with speculation if noproof that the election was not entirely free with some press claimsthat Putins popularity extended beyond the grave to more than amillion deceased voters. His margin of victory in 2004 was greater andapparently with only the votes of the living, when he got over 70% ofthe vote. Corruption and organised crime increased after the end of the Sovietera because it could be highly lucrative with little chance of beingcaught breaking the law. The oligarchs such as Boris Berezovsky (whomade his fortune from selling cars, aluminum and a media empire) orRoman Abramovich (who made his fortune in oil and aluminum) may or maynot have made their fortunes legally but they provided Boris Yeltsinwith support and favours for his family. In return Boris Yeltsin soldthem state oil and mining enterprises on the cheap. They would haveargued that was their reward for working and supporting the government.They would have preferred to call it influence rather than corruption.They had also helped the central government out of its worst financialposition by loaning it money in return for free or heavily subsidizedshares in soon to be privatised state enterprises. Yeltsin would havepreferred to take loans off the oligarchs rather than the InternationalMonetary Fund because they would not insist on social and economicreforms or restrict payments due to fears over human rights abuses inChechnya. The basic concept behind the loans for shares scheme wasthat the oligarchs got shares in public companies in return for lendingthe government money and bank rolling Yeltsins re-election campaign in1996. Yeltsin kept his promises and they got the rest of their shares.Their influence seemed complete when Potanin joined the government andChubais returned to office. Although the oligarchs were not corrupttheir power was not particularly healthy for democracy (or economic andmoral integrity). Such close links between government and big businesswould have raised major concerns in more established democracies. Thegreater economic stability of the Putins first presidential term meanthe longer needed their loans as much as Yeltsin had. There were however others whose fortunes were made by more definitecriminal methods. Russian investors have been the victims of scams andmass fraud on numerous occasions. One such scam was organised bySergei Mavrodi. He set up a bogus investment company known as MMMinvestments that defrauded many millions of Russians of their savings.The scam was a pyramid scheme that defrauded its millions of investorsof up to $15 million, only it was a Russian variant in that Mavrodi didnot get all the money. Although Mavrodi had masterminded the scheme helost 90% of his ill-gotten proceeds to private businesses taking theircut and paying off dishonest government officials. These unknown anduncaught officials would have threatened Mavrodi with jail if he didnot pay them, just like in the Soviet era but with much money atstake. That was how easy it could be to become a millionaire in BorisYeltsins Russia, providing you could afford to bribe enough people tostay in business. The only problem for Mavrodi was that the fraud had been on such alarge scale that his crimes could not remain undetected. He waseventually caught after five years on the run and went to jail. Russiais also a favorite destination for cars stolen from the rest of Europe,a form of organised crime aided by corruption that was on the rise inthe post-Soviet era. In Soviet days there was a long waiting list forcars but since then car ownership has spread. Russia is the idealdestination for exporting these stolen cars to, as it is such a vastcountry, has plenty of potential customers who do not ask questions,plus a high level of corruption amongst officials. The complicity andcorruption of high-ranking civil servants and police mean that theorganised crime gangs involved make a tidy profit without any fear ofbeing caught. Corrupt government officials even buy and use the carsthemselves both for private and official use. Vladimir Putin did not want as a first priority to reverse the rise oforganised crime and corruption seen during the post-Soviet period. Hedid however wish to regain as much of the central governments economicand political power plus its freedom of action. By driving Berezovskyinto self imposed exile and jailing Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Putin managedto subdue the other oligarchs into doing nothing to upset him or flaunttheir political leverage. Putin could not realistically over turn theeconomic changes of the Yeltsin era. The oligarchs may have achievedtheir vast fortunes due to the weakness of the Russian State andperhaps dubious ways of making money but Putin can hardly takeeverything back off them. The sheer number of privatisations had aidedthe astute, the dishonest as well as the corrupt to gain their unfairshare of the loot. The redistribution of state enterprises andbusinesses into private ownership was great, amounting to 88% of theSoviet era state sector in Russia alone. Putin admired the men thattried to make the Russian State strong like Peter the Great, Lenin andAndropov. For Putin rebuilding the infrastructure of the Russian Stateis a priority, as the collapse of Soviet authority was largelyresponsible for the rise of organised crime and corruption in the post-Soviet era. In some ways Putin is a throwback to a Stalinistapparatchick in that in his view the State is more important thanindividuals. Putin claims to be a democrat but his concept ofdemocracy is one were order and the state take precedence over people.On the other hand it means that restoration of state power should fillthe power vacuum that allowed the extraordinary growth of organisedcrime and corruption during the 1990s Another aspect to the rise in organised crime and corruption in thepost-Soviet economy was the increase in the hard drugs trade, which hadnot officially been recognised as existing in the Soviet Union.Illegal drugs and the trafficking of them were supposed to only happenin the capitalist decadence of Western Europe and North America. Sincethe collapse of communism the Russia and other former Soviet stateshave had as much trouble in countering the rise in the drugs trade.Ironically the production of opium and heroin originating fromAfghanistan and Pakistan increased greatly after the Soviet Unionsinvasion of Afghanistan in 1979. Proceeds from the drugs trade inWestern Europe and North America proved very lucrative to organisedcrime gangs that started to enter the Soviet Union. Money the opiumgrowers made from the trade was used to fund the Afghan resistance tothe Soviet occupation forces. When that was added to by unlimitedAmerican military and financial aid it was no wonder that the Afghanwar played a large role in the collapse of the Soviet Union. Thechaotic and sudden collapse of the Soviet Union made it easier tosmuggle, supply and sell drugs and then launder the proceeds in theformer Soviet republics. St Petersburg was the main city to be affected by drug addiction, witharound 70,000 users by the end of the 1980s. Drug addiction hadalready been increasing before the end of the Soviet era but wideravailability of drug supplies and gangs supplying them worsened thesituation. Organised crime gangs were sure of making profits with somany addicts needing to feed their habits, plus they could control theprostitution and robberies that desperate addicts resorted to pay fordrugs. The harsh economic factors and the dullness of life after theend of the Soviet era led to an increase in alcohol and hard drug abuseas people tried to forget how awful their lives were. The high profitsand low risks of getting caught attracted rival gangs to the formerSoviet Union. Aside from corruption and organised crime the hard drugsexplosion has left Russia with another increasing problem the spread ofHIV and AIDS. The Russian government has failed to promote needleexchanges or safe sex, and if the estimates of 5 million people beinginfected by 2007 prove accurate it could pose a greater threat toRussias future than corruption, organised crime or Chechen terrorists. In the post-Soviet era organised crime and corruption affected andcarried out by ordinary citizens. Open-air markets sprang up in citiessuch as Moscow and St Petersburg particularly at the weekends, aspeople exercised their newfound rights to buy and sell in public. Itwas an ideal way for people to make tax-free cash in hand quickly. Themarkets were also a good opportunity for organised crime gangs as theycould recruit people to sell their fake and pirated goods at the sametime as laundering their money. The unregulated nature of the marketsof course presented the organised crime gangs the opportunity forextorting cash out of traders selling their own goods. These marketswere the ideal place to sell and obtain forgeries and fake goods at thefraction of the cost of original brands or to dispose of stolen goods.The trend bares a remarkable similarity to the markets and car bootsales across Europe. There are other ways in which ordinary Russians could make money tomaintain or improve their standard of living in light of harshereconomic conditions. For instance motorists were more than happy touse their cars as ad hoc and unauthorized taxis in Moscow whilstpensioners or the ill would sell their medical prescriptions to drugaddicts. In Russia there has been a rising trend of tax evasionamongst the rich, the poor, the powerful and the powerless. The richunder declare their income, or send their money to off shore tax havenswhilst the poor either two or three jobs or a main job were the bulk oftheir pay is given cash in hand. Pavel Borodin when he was not busytaking bribes claimed that at least 300 members of the Duma officiallyonly owned the Russian built Volga cars but were in fact the owners ofluxury European or American built cars that would have cost far morethan their official income. Falling government revenues canfinancially weaken the state and lessen the funds to combat c orruptionand organised crime. Therefore various factors contributed, aided and permitted the rise oforganised crime and corruption within the economic sector of the formerSoviet Union republics in the post-Soviet era. Whilst privateenterprise had been outlawed for virtually the entire Soviet era exceptduring the New Economic Policy and the last years of the Soviet Unioncorruption was already well established. Organised crime had also beenpresent although on a lesser scale during the Soviet era, as witnessedby the existence of the black market and the availability of harddrugs. Clampdowns on illegal traders were random and targeted at thosethat had not paid bribes to the relevant police or officials. The yearsof stagnation and corruption in the Soviet Union were sure to influenceeconomic and political shape of the former Soviet republics. Gorbachevfailed to keep the Soviet Union existing with the policies of glasnostand perestroika but the subsequent collapse of the Soviet system was acurse for the leaders of the successor states. However, it was an idealopportunity for the astute emerging business classes, organised crimegangs and those bureaucrats that were surprisingly easy to bribe tomake their fortune. Sometimes the distinction and links between thesegroups were difficult to detect or distinguish. When the Soviet Union finished its legacy financial and bankingsystems were backward and open to vast amounts of fraud and moneylaundering. Organised crime gangs were well positioned to takeadvantage of what remained of the old system before new systems wereput into operation, where they encountered people who got in their waythey found violence, threats and bribery effective means to get whatthey wanted. Through extortion, investment and takeovers theycontrolled much of the income from the new private enterprises. Economic decline and the threat to peoples livelihoods made acontribution to the rise of organised crime and corruption in thepost-Soviet economics of the former Soviet Union. When faced withhyperinflation, under employment and unemployment ordinary peopleresorted to second and third jobs, mass tax evasion or settingthemselves up as market traders. Those that worked as minor officialsor in the police could always make other people pay fees or fines andincrease the level of corruption yet further. Crime gangs andindividual fraudsters took advantage of corrupt officials, police andjudges to profit from their extortions and scams. Russia and the otherformer Soviet republics to a lesser extent seemed to be convulsed by anextreme form of economic Darwinism. In that economic Darwinism only themost ruthless, the meanest and the most immoral survived, the restwould go under. In the new Russia rich and poor seemed to forget all oftheir morals in the search for money. The primary reason for the rise in organised crime and corruption onthe post-Soviet economy was the economic and political vacuum thatdeveloped with the end of communism. New leaders such as Boris Yeltsinand Leonid Kravchuk in the Ukraine headed governments that introducedeconomic reforms that provided ideal opportunities for organised crimeand increased whilst reducing the power of their respective states.Gangs were able to exploit the lack of law and order to run protectionrackets, car stealing rings and intimidate or murder any journalist,politician or business people that got in their way. Many people tookthe physically safer option of doing as they were told and those thattook bribes counted their money stayed quiet. The relative weakness ofthe central governments especially in Russia meant local and regionalgovernors would often become linked with organised crime gangs andgladly reaped the rewards of their corruption. The hasty privatisationled to the emergence of billionaire b usiness tycoons such as BorisBerezovsky, Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Roman Abramovich who boosteddwindling government funding by lending it money and buying stateenterprises at greatly discounted prices. The oligarchs had massed agreat deal of economic power and political influence especially underthe Yeltsin presidency. Corruption was rife in the Kremlin as well asin the cities and the regions most notably when Pavel Borodin wascaught in a multimillion scandal awarding contracts to the highestbribers. Conversely Vladimir Putin has restored the Kremlins power andattempted to counter the rise of organised crime and corruption. Putin has to some extent succeeded in controlling the oligarchs eventhough his crackdown has been selective, only targeting those that areno longer of use to his government. It would still seem that everybodyin Russia has a price, bribery and corruption are widespread, itappears to be deeply ingrained in Russian society whilst organisedcrime seems certain to continue as long there are vast sums of money tobe made. The profits from extortion, money laundering, the drugs trade,gun running and prostitution mean that rival gangs will continue withtheir violent turf wars. It is a sad indictment on the Russiangovernment that the crime gangs are in more danger from each other thanthey are from the forces of law and order. Civil servants, the police,government and the FSB all seemed willing to make money on the side.Even in the former Soviet republics that have made the most successfulswitch to liberal democracy and capitalism, namely Estonia, Latvia andLithuania organised crime still exists as it does throughout theWestern world. Governments can not prevent the basic economic factthat crime does pay for those that do not get caught. Bibliography Dejevsky, M. Putins critics would do well to revisit the past The Independent Friday 11 March 2005 Dukes, P. A History of Russia c. 882-1996 3rd edition (1998) Macmillan, Basingstoke Dunbabin, J.P.D the Cold War The Great powers and their allies (1994) Longman Group, London Freeland, C. Sale of the Century The Inside Story of the Second Russian Revolution (2000) Little, Brown and Company, London Harvey, R. the Rise and Fall of World Communism (2003) John Murray, London Henderson, K. and Robinson, N. Post-Communist Politics an Introduction (1997) Prentice Hall, London Hobsbawm, E. Age of Extremes the Short Twentieth Century (1994) Michael Joseph, London Holmes, L. Post-Communism an Introduction (1997) Polity Press, Cambridge Jack, J. Inside Putins Russia (2000) Granta Books, London Kampfner, J. Inside Yeltsins Russia (1994) Cassell, London Khasbulatov, R. the Struggle for Russia Power Change in the Democratic Revolution (1993) Routledge, London Marples, D.R the Collapse of the Soviet Union 1985 1991 (2003) Pearson Longman, Harlow Martin, V The oligarchs revenge The Guardian Saturday 19, 2005 Meir, A. Black Earth Russia after the fall (2004) Harper Perennial, London Milner, M. Former Soviet states fail to reform The Guardian Monday November 25, 2002 Politkovskaya, A. A Dirty War A Russian Reporter in Chechnya (2001) The Harvil Press, London Service, R. A History of Modern Russia from Nicholas II to Putin-new edition (2003) Penguin, London Solotov, V Klepikova E. Boris Yeltsin A Political Biography (1992) Weidenfeld and Noicholson, London Templeton Thorpe Business Intelligence Report, Volume 2 Number 39, 5 February 2003. The Economist Very like a Bear December 23rd 1999 The Times, Register Obituaries Aslan Maskhadov, Chechen leader thatbeat the Russians in war but failed to win the peace Thursday March10 2005 White, S. Rose, R and McAllister, I. How Russia Votes (1997) Chatham House Publishers, New Jersey

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Information Security The John McCumber Model Essay

1) McCumber model: There are number of different models proposed as framework for information security but one of the best model is McCumber model which was designed by John McCumber. In this model the elements to be studied are organized in a cube structure, in which each axis indicates a dissimilar viewpoint of some information security issue and there are three major modules in each axis. This model with 27 little cubes all organized together looks similar like a Rubiks cube. There are three axes in the cube they are: goals desired, Information states, and measures to be taken. At the intersection of three axes you can research on all angles of an information security problem. Goals desired the three goals expected when you are†¦show more content†¦2) Confidentiality- Policy practice- Transmission: The university should have a policy for students and faculty, such as they are not permitted to share the lecture notes or subject information with anyone else who is not registered for the class or not authorized. 3) Confidentiality-Technology- Transmission: The university should allocate separate username and password for only the students who are registered into the subject to check the lecture material and updates. 4) Confidentiality - Education Training-Storage: The university should educate the students and faculty to access authorized data without exposing the data to outsiders. 5) Confidentiality- Policy Practice- Storage: The university should have a policy, such as the access to lecture notes posted or info of the subject can be accessed by registered students only 6) Confidentiality-Technology- Storage: The university should have the latest technology and antivirus to maintain the database servers from threats. 7) Confidentiality - Education Training- Processing: The confidentiality can be protected in the state of processing through education is by educating and training the students and lecturers to exchange information among the authorized persons only through allocated secured student email. 8) Confidentiality - Policy and Practice-Processing: The university should have a policy that the students and lecturers are authorizedShow MoreRelatedThe Threats Of Business Information Resources And Corrective Actions On The Modern Age Of Technology2249 Words   |  9 PagesThis paper will address some of the threats to business’ information resources and corrective actions on how these businesses can protect themselves in the modern age of technology. While technology has rapidly expanded a corporation’s abilities to deploy digital communication and data sharing, it has also ushered in a wave of cyber criminals and illegal data mining of proprietary information. This paper contains information on the tools that can be used to protect businesses and private users fromRead MorePrinciples of Information Security, 4th Ed. - Michael E. Whitman Chap 0118683 Words   |  75 PagesLicensed to: CengageBrain User Licensed to: CengageBrain User Principles of Information Security, Fourth Edition Michael E. Whitman and Herbert J. Mattord Vice President Editorial, Career Education Training Solutions: Dave Garza Director of Learning Solutions: Matthew Kane Executive Editor: Steve Helba Managing Editor: Marah Bellegarde Product Manager: Natalie Pashoukos Development Editor: Lynne Raughley Editorial Assistant: Jennifer Wheaton Vice President Marketing, Career Education TrainingRead MoreModern History.Hsc.2012 Essay25799 Words   |  104 PagesThe British and French wanted U.S. * Units used to reinforce their troops already on the battle lines and not waste scarce shipping on bringing over supplies. * The U.S. rejected the first proposition and accepted the second. General John J. Pershing, American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) commander, refused to break up U.S. units to be used as reinforcements for British Empire and French units. * As an exception, he did allow African-American combat regiments to be used in French

Analysis Of Job Market in Australia Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Analysis Of Job Market in Australia. Answer: Job Market This section provides an overview of the job market in Australia. AS per the statistics, it is reported that people with job has increased in Australia by 38% over 17 years (Salt, 2017). This suggests that approximately every one person in two people have a job in Australia. The statistics also suggest that part time jobs have also grown in recent years (Salt, 2017). The reports suggest that job market in Australia is strengthening, and there is decrease in the unemployment rates. The growth is unanimous over Australia, and a sharp increase in job adverts is seen in most of the Australian states and cities. The current employment trend sectors include: Healthcare, Professional Services, Education, Information Technology, and Retail industry (VisaBureau, 2017). Whereas, other sectors like mining and manufacturing has seen some downfall (Sinibaldi, 2016).Significant increase is seen in the healthcare, and education sectors. A steady increase is seen in the professional services and inf ormation technology sector. Also, a steady increase is witnessed in the service sector as a result of the increasing customer support concerns. A slow increase is seen in the construction sector, however, the mining sector has witnessed downfall, majorly due to the need of skilled labour in the mining industry and the decrease in the unskilled labour. As per the job market reports, it is seen that healthcare has seen greatest job growth, as the ageing population has pushed the demand for more nurses and carers. Also, the increasing food habits and trends have stimulated the need for wellness and healthcare services(Sinibaldi, 2016). The technological advancements and the latest trends and the increasing cyber frauds and attacks, has increased the need for better cyber security and literacy. Moreover, most industries have adopted latest technologies for facilitating and automating various operations, which has led to a further increase in the information technology sector. A sharp rise is also seen in the design industry jobs like graphic designing, digital designing, and interior designing jobs. Information technology also plays a major role in the web designing jobs. Additionally, the increase in the online industry has also increased the IT industry job prospects. The next industry that has seen growth is the education industry (Molloy, 2015). The growth in the school and college population and the growth in the part-time teaching section have led to growth in the teaching jobs. Moreover, the education industry has significantly contributed to the increase in the part-time jobs. A sharp increase is seen in the professional services, like engineers, doctors, managers and administrators (VisaBureau, 2017). Today, the organizations have become more formal, increasing the job opportunities in various roles like administration, management, marketing and sales. Apart from the professional services, the retail industry jobs have also seen a significant increase. With the increasing lifestyle changes and the purchasing power, a sharp increase has been witnessed in the retail industry jobs (Sinibaldi, 2016). Moreover, the online retail industry, and the customer service industry has also seen a significant increase as a result of the increase in the retail industry jobs. Paid Occupation I wish to make a career in marketing. Marketing field interests me particularly because of the range of exposure and jobs it provides. Marketing field consists of plenty of jobs, and there are different types of jobs based on the company and the field of marketing. The marketing jobs are majorly client-oriented however; there are positions that dont require the executive to work in accordance with the client or customer. Marketing manager position is a senior marketing position wherein the manager is more involved in managing the marketing team, or most of the marketing department, and plans the strategies for future growth. The marketing executive is the position which is constantly in touch with the client, and handles the various client queries and specifications. Apart from that, product marketing managers, and brand managers are not directly in contact with the clients but would be largely involved with the brand and devise strategies for brand promotion, and building a brand im age (Lake, 2017). They deal with all the product specifications and manage the product related changes and devise strategies for promotion of specific products. Some of the most interesting roles in marketing include advertising, event management, media planning, and advertising. Advertising and media planning comprise of all the advertising and media campaigns that attract the consumers and help the company enhance its brand image. The marketing jobs are considered as one of the most challenging jobs (Lake, Careers: Jobs in Marketing, 2017). To pursue a career in marketing a person must first either takes a bachelors degree in business administration, and masters degree in management studies with majors in marketing. Students can also take online management courses to get a degree in management. Various universities also provide certificate courses in marketing (Scherman, 2014). Thus, a person interested in making a career in marketing should undertake management education, and relevant experience in administration or sales will be an added advantage. The salary differences among marketing jobs are as vast as the field itself. The salary of the marketing job largely depends on the job description, relevant experience, and qualifications and is also linked with the industry standards. The salary range increases with the designations, and chief marketing manager or simply the marketing manager is the highest paid job in marketing jobs (BusinessSchools, 2016). The salary of a CMO (Chief Marketing officer) ranges between $80,000 and $ 260,000 (Glassdoor, 2017). The salary is highest based upon the relevant experience and the additional qualifications. The average salary of a marketing executive in Australia is $67,000 (Glassdoor, 2017). The marketing executive is the entry level position in marketing jobs and a marketing executive can get promoted to different positions in marketing field based on his/her relevant experience in the field and interest. A marketing executive may get promoted to a product manager, team manager, and a senior marketing manager, and besides making a career in marketing, the marketin g manager may also make career in sales. The salary growth and career growth prospects in marketing are higher and impressive. The marketing and sales fields are interconnected. The skills obtained in marketing jobs can be largely used in sales job. The marketing executives with relevant experience can change their career and adopt sales career (Scherman, 2014). The marketing skills can be used in media planning jobs, and even in event management. The marketing job skills can be applied in advertising and public relations field as well. Marketing jobs contribute to the economy as well as to the society. Marketing has contributed towards raising the standard of living of the society. Today, most marketing efforts are directed towards increasing customer satisfaction (Ifezue, 2005). Marketing jobs are more aligned towards producing goods that meet the customer needs and preferences. Also, marketing aims at creating demands for produced goods and via advertising and promotions by making customers aware about the products and encourage them to use their products, and thereby raise the standard of living. Marketing also largely contributes to the economy, majorly by increasing the employment opportunities and contributes towards increasing the national income, by increasing the demands for the goods and services (Ifezue, 2005). The increased demand of the goods and services is fulfilled by increased production and increased incomes, it also contributes towards increasing the exports and thereby contributes towards increa sing the national income. Unpaid Job CARE Australia is an international organization which provides volunteering opportunities in Australia as well as in abroad. CARE Australia works towards saving lives and reducing poverty, and supporting the communities facing extreme poverty. The organization helps the worlds most vulnerable communities by providing different services like healthcare, employment, and providing basic amenities (Care, 2017). The volunteers can take up jobs like administration, other volunteering works like providing healthcare needs, setting up help centers at various places, volunteering different fund-raising activities, volunteering activities during festivals, and other public events. Such volunteering activities include managing the crowd, maintaining harmony. The urge for helping the needy communities has encouraged me to take such a job. The job is challenging, and tests various skills of the volunteers, like managing tasks and completing them in tight budgets, patience, managing skills, and sales skills (Care, 2017). Every job a humanitarian side and exploring that humanitarian side has particularly attracted me towards volunteering jobs. The basic volunteering jobs like admin jobs, handling the crowd, communicating with other centers generally dont require any special education or training, however, ether are few skilled jobs that require training and education. These jobs include management jobs, healthcare aid jobs, and fund-raising jobs. Yes, there is potential of gaining a paid position in volunteer organisations. A volunteer can achieve a paid position by getting relevant experience in the field. there are few universities that provide humanitarian and human development education for encouraging students to undertake volunteer jobs. Volunteers can secure higher positions in such welfare organizations. The volunteer jobs enable the volunteers to develop new skills which can be used in other jobs. The volunteering job gives the volunteers exposure in healthcare, sales, marketing, administration and management jobs. Thus, the volunteers can develop skills which can be used in getting paid jobs in management, administration and healthcare. Unpaid jobs largely contribute towards society and economy of various developed and developing countries. The volunteer jobs are aligned towards improving the conditions for the vulnerable communities. The volunteer jobs create employment opportunities in various remote areas and at the same time fight with poverty which is the root cause of various problems and crime. Thus, the unpaid jobs largely contribute towards the society. Despite of the fact that these unpaid jobs are unpaid and dont provide any monetary gains to the volunteers, these jobs do add to the national economy (Paquette, 2014). These jobs might not generate income, but they save expenses, which also add to the income. The inclusion of such jobs in national economy is well explained by using the example of the importance of women completing the household work and this is an unpaid job. Managing the needs of the vulnerable communities and providing them support would cost the government millions of rupees and these ru pees are saved by such NGOs and other organisations (UMICH, 2017). Hence, it can be said that the unpaid jobs or the volunteer jobs also contribute towards the economy. Recruitment Recruitment is an important function in getting the right job. There are different ways of getting a job in the company. The most common way of getting a job today is using the different job portal websites (ICI, 2014). The major job seeking websites in Australia are SEEK, Adecco, Gumtree, MyCareer, and JobSeeler. SEEK is the leading job seeking website in Australia. MEC is the leading marketing organisation in Australia, and I would like to seek a job in MEC Australia. Other than MEC, Woolsworth, Nous Group and BirdsNest are the companies where I would like to work. Woolsworth is the largest retailer and supermarket chain in Australia. This company particularly inspires me because there are various marketing opportunities in the company which will help the company to devise schemes and compete with other retail companies (McCauley, 2017). Nous Group is a consulting firm, and provides complete marketing and other professional services to its clients. The company has high influential clients and working with this company will help to gain a lot of exposure and gain knowledge about various marketing concepts (GreatPlacetoWork, 2017). BirdsNest is a retail company, which provides its employees ample opportunities for learning and development. Before choosing a company it is important to undertake some research about the company. These companies have been chosen based on the ratings and rankings from different job seeking sites. An online research will be conducted about the companys vision and mission, its centers, its policies (Joyce, 2016). A research about the companys image will also be conducted. Moreover, it is important to also understand and research about the organization culture and work culture of these companies. It is important to research about the growth prospects in the company, and how the company handles the ethical issues. Although, it is impossible for the job-seekers to get all the information about the company, however, the job seekers must conduct specific research analysis about the company, its goodwill, its brand image, its culture, and the opportunities company provides to its employees for growth and development. However, it is important for the job-seekers to gather all the available informati on about the company so as to have some understanding about its business and purpose. Gathering information about the company is helpful for the job-seekers in passing the interviews. It is important for the job-seekers to conduct an online search so as to gain knowledge about the company. There are different ways of finding a job. The most important ways of finding a job, are using the job portals, using references, and applying via the openings provided in employment newspapers or at company websites. Using the company websites and employment news was a common practice previously, however, today, people hardly visit the company websites for jobs, and dont use newspapers for finding jobs(Doyle, 2017). The method of using references was also influential previously; however, the companies are becoming merit-oriented, and believe in recruiting educated professionals based on their merits and skills. The above-mentioned methods are not widely practiced today for finding jobs. The most effective way of finding a job is the job portal method. The method is more effective because we can modify and customize our research and find the best companies that match our job preferences. Moreover, job-seekers can find best jobs from a variety of jobs. Marketing itself is a diverse field and includes different jobs and positions. The job portals make it easy for the job-seekers to manage their job search (Doyle, 2017). Moreover, the job portals allow jobseekers to further differentiate their career choices by using various departments, like branding, product management, advertisement, Public relations, and sales. Hence, it becomes easier for the job seeker to choose the career and position of their choice. Another major feature of the job portal is that the employees can apply for multiple companies at a time, which saves their time an energy. The job portals include the relevant experience required for the employees to apply for a particular job, and thereby minimize the hassle for the organizations as well as for the job-seekers. Based on the simplicity and ease of job-search, job portals and job seeking websites are considered as the most effective way of job-search. Conclusion Employment contributes towards the economy and plays a major role in improving the society. Today, there are various job opportunities for job-seekers, however, it is important for the job-seekers to effectively manage their job-search and choose an appropriate career that matches their skills and knowledge. The report provides a detailed analysis of the job market and facilitates job-seeking process for the freshers. References BusinessSchools. (2016). Business Schools. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from www.businessschools.com: https://www.allbusinessschools.com/marketing/salary/ Care. (2017). CARE Australia. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.care.org.au/careers/volunteer/ Doyle, A. (2017). The Balance. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.thebalance.com/top-best-job-websites-2064080 Glassdoor. (2017). Glassdoor. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.glassdoor.co.uk/Salaries/sydney-marketing-executive-salary-SRCH_IL.0,6_IM962_KO7,26.htm GreatPlacetoWork. (2017). Great Place to Work. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.greatplacetowork.com.au/best-companies/best-places-to-work-in-australia-100-or-more-employees ICI. (2014). International Career Institute. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.ici.edu.au/blog/the-best-20-australian-job-and-career-sites/ Ifezue, A. (2005). The Role of Marketing in Economic Development in Developing Countries. Innovative Marketing (Hybrid) , 1 (1). Joyce, S. (2016). Job-Hunt. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.job-hunt.org/choosing.shtml Lake, L. (2017). The Balance. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.thebalance.com/exploring-careers-in-marketing-2294887 Lake, L. (2017, July). The Balance. Retrieved Spetember 5, 2017, from https://www.thebalance.com/what-does-a-marketer-do-2295194 McCauley, D. (2017). News.com.au. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/careers/pwc-named-australias-top-company-to-work-for-by-linkedin/news-story/e1a36acf32b2081c7079385ef853e1dd Molloy, F. (2015, November). The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.smh.com.au/national/tertiary-education/your-future-job-2020-trends-for-uni-graduates-20151116-gl0ec6.html Paquette, C. (2014). ESSA. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from ESSA: https://economicstudents.com/2014/05/the-effect-of-omitting-unpaid-work-from-national-accounts/ Salt, B. (2017, May 18). The Australian. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/bettercities/job-growth-in-australia-points-to-future-prosperity/news-story/4e6b4a314798e41a602254513f03aaf2 Scherman, J. (2014). Rasmussen College. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.rasmussen.edu/degrees/business/blog/how-to-become-marketing-manager/ Sinibaldi, T. (2016). Chandler Macleod. Retrieved Spetember 5, 2017, from https://www.chandlermacleod.com/blog/australias-employment-trends/ UMICH. (2017). International Center UMICH. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://internationalcenter.umich.edu/students/employment-volunteer VisaBureau. (2017). Visa Bureau. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.visabureau.com/australia/news/23-05-2017/current-job-market-in-australia.aspx